Live Dealers Mistake & Caught Cheating !
My wife and I were just playing blackjack in Colorado.
The dealer pulled a couple of small cards to also pull a 17.
My question is: How much leeway does the casino have when they make a mistake at a table game?
We first went to the Nevada Gaming Control Board to check on any applicable laws, regulations, or policies.
After a blackjack free bet dealer mistake is addressed, if there is an unresolved dispute as to alleged winnings or losses or the manner in which a game was conducted, the regulator should be contacted.
The question today is about casino leeway in correcting mistakes.
And here's where it gets interesting.
Practically speaking, the casino has all the leeway it wants when it comes to protecting the money and the integrity of the game.
It ranges from the scenario described by the submitter of the question, where the boss was standing there and caught the dealer's miscount while the cards were still on the table, so that there was no question about who won and lost, to surveillance reviewing its tape of a hand played many rounds earlier and determining a mistake was made, then the casino taking its money back from a player, or in rarer instances paying off a player, long after the fact.
Some version of this happens all the time.
How far the casino goes in rectifying dealer mistakes has a lot to do with its corporate culture and the amount of money in contention.
The real sweat shops will take back bets in the blackjack free bet dealer mistake figures and damn the consequences; they don't care how many players they drive away in their piggishness.
Classier joints with an understanding of customer service and loyalty and the immutable workings of the house advantage, aren't averse to letting go of bets in the hundreds lost to dealer misplays.
To be sure, master robot grand blackjack have a word or two with the dealer and try to make sure mistakes are blackjack free bet dealer mistake />But the better places, in our experience, chalk up occasional dealer miscues to the cost of doing business and move on.
Now, what about when the dealer, floor, or eye doesn't snap to mistakes, especially when bigger bets are at stake.
What's the player's responsibility in such situations?
We dare say most players will keep their mouths shut and take the money.
They think: The dealer is the expert trained and overseen by the casino, which also has high-tech surveillance equipment, computers to analyze your play and keep records on you, and tapes phrase blackjack collective accept later review.
Me, I'm just here to have fun and take away all the winnings I can, not to do their job for them.
Here's another way of looking at that.
It's the casino's responsibility to make sure the payouts are correct; it's their business, after all.
Similarly, it's the player's responsibility to be paid correctly; if a player is shorted, he or she has to point out the error to get it corrected.
But what if a dealer overpays a player?
As we said, most players will probably go with the flow.
If a boss appears later to take the money back, there's no reason to argue if you know you were overpaid, and even if you don't, you might not want to go to the effort of making a stink over a single bet.
The tape tells the tale, and presumably that's the reason for the imposed correction.
In these cases, though, the customer has the right to ask to see the evidence and press the matter, including bringing in Gaming Control, if the casino won't comply.
Some players, on the other hand, will speak up if the dealer makes a mistake in their favor.
They see it in black and white, no different than returning any extra money if a cashier in a store hands back too much change.
Their ethics simply won't allow them to walk away with money they know isn't theirs just because a clerk or dealer made a counting mistake.
Even some advantage players, though they're not at the blackjack table to have fun, but to take money out of the casino, prefer to do so with honesty and integrity, or even just with an eye on the wheel of karma: The blackjack gods will surely take it back in one way or another.
Of course, ethics aren't necessarily black and white.
We could argue long and hard about "right" and "wrong" in a situation where the casino offers a game to the public with rules they set, then blackjack free bet dealer mistake certain people from playing because they can assign plus and minus values to the cards.
Is it ethical if the house takes advantage of the more ignorant?
Then again, do two wrongs make a right?
And how about certain advanced advantage plays in which a player actually steers a dealer into making payout errors?
Is that okay, even in the context of how predatory casinos can be zappit blackjack their customers?
For example, is or blackjack odds of each hand that acceptable, given that the casino is handing out free booze in an effort to cloud your judgment?
To summarize, the casino has the right correct mistakes, just like any business, but as usual in the world of gambling, what blackjack free bet dealer mistake beyond that to rectify misplays constitutes a major gray area.
We look forward to hearing what you all have to say about dealer mistakes.
Online casino scam mistakes - Compilation
Casino blackjack rules and strategy to play and win the game.. When the dealer has a Blackjack, all bets, except insurance, will lose.. So, if you feel puzzled about the game, you are always free to ask your dealer for an advice.... A common mistake made by a lot of players is boosting the size of their bet in the cases ...
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
The true answer
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also idea excellent, agree with you.
Yes, really. And I have faced it.
Bravo, excellent phrase and is duly
All can be
Sounds it is quite tempting
I can not participate now in discussion - it is very occupied. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion.
You are not right. I am assured. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
Many thanks for the help in this question.
It is already far not exception
Very valuable phrase
I am sorry, that has interfered... At me a similar situation. Let's discuss.
In it something is. Earlier I thought differently, I thank for the information.
Willingly I accept. An interesting theme, I will take part. I know, that together we can come to a right answer.
I regret, that I can not help you. I think, you will find here the correct decision.
What remarkable topic
In my opinion, you are mistaken.
Very good question
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss.
I recommend to you to look a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.
I about it still heard nothing
It is already far not exception