$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

🍒 Why Does the Blackjack Dealer Always Win? - Blackjack House Edge

The night with home friends at blackjack the
  • 97% payout rates and higher
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Players welcome!
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus

Blackjack night at home with friends

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Unlimited free play
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Monthly drawings
  • Slot tournaments
Join the Club!

Shop for Blackjack in Poker & Casino. Buy products such as Costway Folded 7 Player Pocker Blackjack Table Texas Holdem Car Game W/ ... Click to Play!

If you've never played blackjack at home or run your own home blackjack game this. you have the players, who are also your friends, arguing over a particular hand.. The better you explain the rules, the more enjoyable the night will be. Click to Play!

Do you want to learn how to deal blackjack?. If you're at home enjoying a session at Planet 7, keep a spare deck of cards on your desk so. or volunteer to play dealer if you're having a poker or table game night with friends. Click to Play!

So you've built a blackjack table and now you want to have some friends over to.. If you're going to be the dealer all night, then you don't have to buy chips. Click to Play!

Positive & Negative Reviews: Blackjack 21: Blackjackist - by KamaGames - #7 App in Blackjack Card Games - Card Games Category - 6 Review Highlights & 129,719 Reviews - AppGrooves: Get More Out of Life with iPhone & Android Apps

If you are planning a home blackjack party involving real currency, consult your local gaming. Once you are informed, plan accordingly to make sure your blackjack night is a "hit.". Have fun playing cards with your friends.
... at the blackjack table or try to put together a home game with family or friends.. Did you know now you can play blackjack for free any time of the day or night ...
Amazon.com : Trademark Blackjack Accessories Set (Multi) : Blackjack Supplies : Sports & Outdoors.. Simple set to use for nights at home with friends.

Playing Blackjack (tournament style) at home with friends and family. $10 buy-in Game 2

Blackjack - Wikipedia Blackjack night at home with friends

Amazon.com : Trademark Blackjack Accessories Set (Multi) : Blackjack Supplies : Sports & Outdoors.. Simple set to use for nights at home with friends.
Steam Community: Social Club VR : Casino Nights.. Play a private game with friends you know, or get to know people from around the world.. the menu, smoke it, but you don't have to go home smelling like a chimney!
Do you want to learn how to deal blackjack?. If you're at home enjoying a session at Planet 7, keep a spare deck of cards on your desk so. or volunteer to play dealer if you're having a poker or table game night with friends.

Blackjack - Wikipedia

blackjack night at home with friends
If you've never played blackjack at home or run your own home blackjack game this. you have the players, who are also your friends, arguing over a particular hand.. The better you explain the rules, the more enjoyable the night will be.
Many people have been enjoying blackjack night with friends and family for quite. will make sure that you'll have a great game at home with friends and family.

blackjack night at home with friends Is it even possible?
This is a typical question one might encounter in an introductory statistics class.
Because the sum of a large number of random variables always will approach a bell curve we can use the central limit theorem to get at the answer.
From my section on the we find the standard deviation in blackjack to be 1.
Any basic statistics book should have a standard normal table which will give blackjack night at home with friends Z statistic of 0.
So the probability of being ahead in your example is about 18%.
I have a few questions regarding blackjack: How often can one expect the dealer to bust and how often can a player expect to win four hands in a row?
When the dealer stands on a soft 17, the dealer will bust about 29.
When the dealer hits on a soft 17, the dealer will bust about 29.
According to mythe probability of a net win is 42.
However, if we skip ties, the probability is 46.
So, the probability of a four wins in a row is 0.
First of all, Https://indonesiaairsoft.com/blackjack/blackjack-pizza-denver.html would like to add my name to the growing list of people who love your web site.
Your information is quite valuable to both the beginning and expert gambler, and you present your findings in a pleasant, understandable, and even humorous manner.
I always check out your site before I head to Las Vegas or Lake Tahoe just to remind me how to play smartly.
Anyway, on to my question.
Well, more of an observation: when the dealer pulls a 5 on a 16 for their sixth consecutive win, there's always someone who gets up and leaves the schecter a 6 fr, muttering that the dealer is a mean cruel heartless soul, and goes in search of a "hotter" table.
But is there any truth in this?
Obviously the dealer is inconsequential to the cards dealt I like to say the dealer is "simply a messenger of the cards" but are streaks in an 8-deck shoe inevitable, and even predictable?
Or is it more like your roulette example, where the odds of each new round are exactly the same?
Thanks once again for your web site.
Thanks for your kind words.
Streaks, such as the dealer drawing a 5 to a 16, are inevitable but not predictable.
Blackjack is not entirely a game of independent trials like roulette, but the deck is not predisposed to run in streaks.
For the non-card counter it may be assumed that the odds are the same in each new round.
Putting aside some minor effects of deck composition, the dealer who pulled a 5 to a 16 the last five times in a row would be just as likely to do it the next time as the dealer who had been busting on 16 for several hours.
According to mythe probability of an overall win in blackjack is 42.
I'm going to assume you wish to ignore ties for purposes of the streak.
In that case, the probability of a win, given a resolved bet, is 46.
The probability of winning n hands is a row is 0.
So the probability of winning six in a row is 0.
Can it actually be true that what I experience has a statistical base?
It seems to me that it takes a lot longer to win X number of chips that to lose the same amount I only play blackjack.
For example, if I start with 300 chips, it might take hours to double my money my goalyet I can lost that number in what seems like almost no time at all.
Can this really be true?
Also, do you have a rule of thumb about when to leave the table when you are winning?
What you have experienced is likely the result of some very bad losing streaks.
It may also be the result of progressive betting or mistakes in strategy.
The basic strategy flat bettor should have a roughly symmetrical expectation in terms of steep ups and downs, slightly favoring steep downs due to the house edge and a 48% chance of a losing hand compared to 43% chance of winning.
If I'm playing for fun then I leave the table when I'm not having fun any longer.
In a six-deck shoe, what is the percentage of times that a blackjack ace face card or ten will come up?
Let n be the number of decks.
Still love your site!
I always turn to your site when I'm having questions, most of the time I will find the answer but not always.
When playing basic strategy blackjack I understand that I will have ups and downs and over the long run I will roughly break even, my question is what is really "over the long run"?
A month, a year, five years?
Thanks for the kind words.
You ask a good question for which there is no firm answer.
It is more a matter of degree, the more you play the more your results will approach the house edge.
I recently replaced my with some information about the standard deviation which may help.
For example this table shows that if you play 10,000 hands of blackjack the probability is 90% of finishing within 192 units where you started after subtracting the expected loss due to the house edge.
So in 10,000 hands you are likely to win or lose less than 2% of total money bet due to random variation.
However if we go up to one million hands the probability is 90% of an 0.
In general the variation in the mean is inversely proportional to the square root of the number of hands you play.
All of this assumes flat read article, otherwise the math really gets messy.
Please explain how to calculate the probability of a blackjack occurring in a single deck.
Do you have any idea what the "record" is for the most sevens thrown with a pair of fair dice in craps go here />I had someone tell me it was 84, but the odds against that many sevens in a row being thrown is so long I'm skeptical.
It seems it's more possible that 84 consecutive passes have come out, but even that's a million to one shot figuratively--literally, it's much worse.
I tried to look on the Web but have no this web page where I would find something like that.
Since this question was submitted, a player held the dice for 154 rolls on May 23, 2009 in Atlantic City.
The probability of this is 1 in 5,590,264,072.
For the probability for any number of throws from 1 to 200, please see my.
For how to solve the problem yourself, see my site, problem 204.
2 blackjack maryland 3 standard deviation of one hand is 1.
If the first card dealt is an ace what is the probability the dealer will have a blackjack?
There are 103 cards remaining in the two decks and 32 are tens.
There are 24 sevens in the shoe.
What piece of information am I missing?
If the odds of pulling a ten count card out of a deck is about 30.
Why do blackjack simulators and blackjack authors state that the odds for a blackjack are 4.
What am I missing?
You are forgetting that there are two possible orders, either the ace or the ten can be first.
Our local casino hands out promotional coupons, which act as a first-card ace in blackjack.
Do you know the overall expectation of having an ace as your first card?
Your question however could be rephrased as, "what is the value of the ace, given that the other card is not a ten.
I checked your web site and I could only find appendixes for multiple card hands in 1 and 2 deck games.
Is this article correct?
The fewer the decks and the greater the number of cards the more this is true.
To test the most likely case to favor hitting, 8 decks and only 3 cards, I ran every possible situation through my combinatorial program.
The following table displays the results.
So standing is the marginally better play.
Following this rule will result in an extra unit once every 1117910 hands.
It would take about 5 years playing blackjack 40 hours a week before this piece of advice saved the player one unit.
I play https://indonesiaairsoft.com/blackjack/blackjack-table-cloth-uk.html deck blackjack in Tunica, MS.
The dealer hits on soft 17.
It seems read more a 10 or face card can beat this and the odds would be in my favor if the dealer draws more than one card.
Also, since most strategies blackjack night at home with friends based on millions of calculations done on a computer, I wonder if those of us who will never play a million hands can rely on slight variations like this one.
Is this a poor, fair or bad move to make?
According to my the expected return of standing is -0.
So my hitting you will save 6.
This is not even does blackjack odds generator apologise marginal play.
There is no sound bite answer to explain why you should hit.
These expected values consider all the numerous ways the hand can play out.
The best play for a billion hands is the best play for one hand.
If you want to deviate from the basic strategy here are some borderline plays: 12 against 3, 12 against 4, 13 against 2, 16 against 10.
Deviating on these hands will cost you much less.
My friend and I are debating two blackjack issues that arose from his Caribbean Vacation.
House favor or player favor?
It depends on the number of decks.
Here is the exact answer for various numbers of decks.
What is the probability that you play ten hands and never obtain a two-card 21?
Assume the cards are reshuffled after each play?
If the probability of a blackjack is p then the probability of not getting any blackjacks in 10 hands is 1- 1-p 10.
For example in a six deck game the answer would be 1- 0.
If there were a shuffle between hands the probability would increase substantially.
It depends whether there is a shuffle between the blackjacks.
Dear Wizard, I was recently playing blackjack with somewhat of a card-shark who also happens to be my friend.
We played casino rules, with one deck- and switched the deal after each time the deck expired.
Later, while I was shuffling- I noticed two 9 of spades side by side.
My friend obviously claimed he did not know about this, but it seems unlikely.
My question is, if you were playing in a similar scenario and were to add one card to the deck, which card would be most advantageous if only you knew about it.
Thank you for your time.
From my we see that each 9 removed from a single deck game increases the house edge by 0.
However if you were going to cheat it would be much better to remove an ace, which increases the house edge by 0.
If you were to add a card as the dealer you should add a 5, which increases the house edge by 0.
So, the best card for the player is the ace and the best for the dealer is the 5.
Occasionally I will increase the bet because I "feel" like I am going to win the next one.
I would think that just about all recreational players bet on feel once in a while at least.
I was reading through some of your past Ask the Wizard columns and saw your calculation of the probability of a string of losses in the August 4, 2002 Column.
My question though is what does that really mean?
Is it that when I sit down at the table, 1 out of my next 173 playing sessions I can expect to have an 8 hand losing streak?
Or does it mean that on any given loss it is a 1 in 173 chance that it was the first of 8 losses coming my way?
I know, I know, its some sort of divine intervention betting system I am talking about and no betting system affects the house edge.
Besides every once in awhile throwing down a bigger bet just adds to the excitement and for some reason it seems logical that if you have lost a string of hands you are "due" for a win.
I have no problem with increasing your bet when you get a lucky feeling.
What is important is that you play your cards right.
Unless you are counting cards you have the free will to bet as much as you want.
As I always say all betting systems are equally worthless so flying by the seat of your pants is just as good as flat betting over the long term.
When I said the probability of losing 8 hands click here a row is 1 in 173 I meant that starting with the next hand the probability of losing 8 in a row is 1 in 173.
The chances of 8 losses in a row over a session are greater the longer the session.
I hope this answers your question.
Dear wiz, I am a blackjack dealer here in Vegas and the other night dealing, I had 4 out of the 6 ace of spades in my hand.
I had A-A-K-A-A-10, so good think is I busted, but quick calculations on the game, we figured getting 4 out of the six aces on one had is around 7mil to 1.
Is this number a little high?
However there are other ways you get four aces in the same hand, for example the last card might be an 8 or 9.
I would have to do a computer simulation to consider all the blackjack night at home with friends combinations.
After performing my own infinite deck analysis for Blackjack with the same rules as yours dealer stands all 17s, re-splitting allowed to 4 hands except Aces, which can only be split once, doubling after splitting, draw only one card to split AcesI came across your site.
In comparing expected values, I obtained the same numbers as you in all cases, except for pair splitting, which were slightly different.
It took me years to get the splitting pairs correct myself.
Cindy of was very helpful.
Resplitting up to four hands is allowed.
Here is how I did it.
For each rank determine the probability of that rank, given that the probability of another 8 is zero.
Take the dot product of the probability and expected value over each rank.
The hardest part of all this is step 3.
I have a very ugly subroutine full of long formulas I determine using probability trees.
It gets especially ugly when the dealer has a 10 or ace up.
Dear wiz, How do you calculate the probability of getting three sevens, three colored sevens, and three suited sevens in blackjack?
The number of ways to draw 3 suited sevens is the number of suits 4 times the number of ways to choose 3 out of 6 sevens of that suit in the shoe.
Good job and well done.
The question: I notice from your May 5, 2003 Column that maryland live casino blackjack table minimums actually CALCULATE your blackjack odds.
I am a bit surprised that you were not using your computer to SIMULATE the results.
Or is this a stupid question, i.
Yes, I calculate blackjack odds using a combinatorial approach, analyzing every possible ways the player and dealer cards can come out, taking the greatest expected value at every decision point.
This is harder to program than a simulation but I feel is more elegant and a nice challenge in recursive programming.
However I still respect my peers to do simulations.
I recently went to Vegas and had an incredible hand of blackjack.
Then was dealt blackjack on all 4 hands!
What are the odds on this?
It was a 6 card deck shoe, I was sitting in 3 seat of a 4 person game.
Assume a fresh shuffle?
Not too many places allow resplitting aces, so be glad you were playing somewhere that did.
Your seat position does not matter.
I just witnessed a friend get four blackjacks in a row starting with the first hand of a visit web page shuffled single deck playing head to head against the dealer.
Instead of a decimal probability, could you tell me the odds of this?
It must be astronomical.
Hope to hear from you.
I seem to get a variation of this question at least once a month.
If the probability of something happening is p then the probability of it happening n times in a row is p n.
However the actual probability is much less, because as the player gets each blackjack the ratio of aces to cards left in the deck ace in blackjack worth />First I wanted to tell you how much I look at and love your web site, and admire your math skills.
Thank you very much.
Michael, a person asked you if they are not counting cards in blackjack, what difference does it make how many decks are being used.
You stated the difference had mostly to do with the number of stiff hands possible, due to the fact that if a small card came out it was more likely a large card would follow and vice-a-versa.
How could that be?
Would it still not be a random event with the possibility of a small or large card coming out being equal, if you are not counting?
Every legitimate blackjack expert agrees the house edge decreases as the number of decks goes down, blackjack apprenticeship charts join other rules being equal.
However it is hard to explain why.
First, it is true that you are more likely to get one small card and one big card in single-deck than multiple-deck.
Although stiffs can cut both ways the player has the free will to stand, the dealer must always hit them.
At a single deck game what is the probability all three players and the dealer get a blackjack the first round after a shuffle?
Following are the probabilities: Player 1 0.
There is a lot of useful and interesting info.
Where would you suggest that a person interested in writing something similar to your "blackjack house edge calculator" go for more info?
Thank you for your response.
Thanks for the compliment.
It took me years to get my blackjack engine to work perfectly splits when the dealer had a 10 or ace showing was very tricky.
An easier way to get the house edge for blackjack is to write a random simulation.
I am a blackjack dealer and last night I amazed my table on a single-deck blackjack game the horrible 6 to 5.
My hand consisted of an Ace up, Ace in the hole and then I drew the other 2 Aces and then a 7 for 21!
What are the odds of this happening and I am especially interested in knowing the math.
In blackjack, what is the probability of the dealer making a stopping hand 17-21 drawing eight cards?
This happened to a friend of mine online and I think it's an extremely rare occurrence.
How about seven cards?
Thanks for the great site and keep up the awesome work!
Thanks for the compliment.
Assuming a six-deck game, where the dealer stands on soft 17, and the player plays basic strategy here are the rounded results based on a 100-million hand simulation.
Event Probability Dealer has blackjack locations blackjack 1 in 22 Player doubles or splits 1 in 7.
So the larger the bankroll the better your chances.
The house edge will lower the probability of success by an amount that is hard to quantify.
For a low more info edge game like blackjack, the reduction in the probability of success will be small.
It would take www billy booze cruise random simulation to know for sure.
Forgive me if I don't bother with that.
VegasClick did a small simulation about.
As I read your analysis of the side bet inam I correct that your odds are for the first hand of the shoe?
It seems to me that if the suits get unbalanced in any direction it would slightly lessen the house edge, and the suits will certainly fluctuate through the shoe.
This is not true.
The remaining deck needs to be exhibit more than a certain degree of skewness for the odds to swing to the player's favor.
Consider a hypothetical side that pays 3 to 1 for any suited pair in a one-deck game.
What all this shows is that if cards are removed at a uniform distribution the odds of winning go down, however at a very skewed distribution the odds go up.
As the deck is played down sometimes your odds get better, and sometimes worse, but in the long run they average out and stay at a 23.
I have been a dealer for 27 years and have seen a lot.
One of my learn more here was a guy who never looked at his cards playing blackjack.
I thought he was nuts of course but some days he won and some days he lost.
Just like most people.
I tried this myself on a free gambling website and won 2 out of 3 times gambling 20 minute sessions.
My question is this: How much worse off are you doing this than trying to play basic strategy?
Under typical Vegas rules 6-deck, dealer hits soft 17 the house edge by always standing is 15.
I lost a lot of money playing Cryptologic Blackjack today.
Within 35 hands, the dealer showed a 6 seven times and won each time.
This was verified through the logs.
If the probability of a dealer bust is 56% with a six, my calculation suggests the odds of this independent event happening six consecutive times is 0.
At they use 8 decks and the dealer stands on a soft 17.
According to mythe probability of the dealer busting with a 6 up is 0.
So the probability of not busing is 1 - 0.
The probability of not busing 7 times out of 7 is 0.
First off, my apologies if you consider this a basic math question.
We use six decks.
Neither my player or I had ever seen this before.
What are the odds of this?
I am a pit supervisor at a local casino and recently had a dealer deal two players two seven of clubs each and give himeself the last seven of clubs as his upcard on a five-deck shoe.
What are the odds of five of the same card coming out of a five-deck shoe in order?
According to standard BJ rules and perfect basic strategy, how many percent of my DOUBLED DOWN hands should I expect to win, push and lose?
Assuming liberal Vegas Strip rules six decks, dealer stands on soft 17, double after split allowed, late surrender allowed, resplitting aces allowed the following are the probabilities of each possible outcome when question blackjack dc bar opinion on the initial two cards.
This does not include doubling after splitting.
I was playing strict Basic Strategy for New Zealand conditions not counting, CSM in use.
Have you ever heard of such a horror streak?
My calculations estimate the probability of 19 straight losses as 1 chance in about 207,000; you may well correct me on this.
Had Free bet dealer mistake done anything differently, I would have been cleaned out well before the 19 hands came up.
From my we see the following probabilities for each initial hand.
By way of comparison, the probability of being dealt a royal flush in video poker is 1 in 649,740, or 2.
If in an 8-deck or continuous shuffle blackjack game there is no difference in the probabilities of a card appearing at any time, why have you posted?
If the probabilities say hit on 16 vs.
I see the change if the deck is shrinking or in a game like Spanish 21 where there is a bonus for 21 with 5 or more cards, but why in an 8-deck game or continuous shuffle?
The reason the strategy changes, according to the number of cards in your hand, as shown in appendix 18, is that every card that leaves the deck changes the probabilities of every card left to be played.
A good example is the single-deck basic strategy says to surrender 7,7 against a 10; but for any other 14 you should hit.
The reason you should surrender is half the sevens have already been removed from the deck.
You need another seven to make 21, the only hand that will beat a dealer 20.
So the shortage of sevens lowers the expected value of hitting to under half a bet, making surrender the better play.
In an eight-deck shoe there are 416 cards.
That may seem like a lot, but 16 against a 10 is such a borderline hand that removal of just one learn more here can making standing a better play.
The rule is that for eight or fewer decks if your 16 is composed of three or more cards, and the dealer has a 10, then you should stand.
In a two-card 16 the average points per card is 8, with a 3-card 16 the average is 5.
click here more small cards out of the deck in the 3-card hand the remaining deck becomes more large card rich, making hitting more dangerous, swaying the odds in favor of standing.
Thanks for maintaining this web site!
I have a question about a blackjack rule that is applied in Dutch casinos: When being dealt a pair of sevens, a third seven will earn you 2:1 on your bet, regardless if you win the hand or not.
However, this only applies when the sevens have NOT been split.
I know that there are 6 dealer up cards in basic strategy that allow splitting sevens and 7 that do not, so the player should have an edge in this particular situation.
But what are the odds of being dealt 3 sevens in blackjack in the first place?
And if dealt 3 sevens, what are the odds they qualify for the 2:1 pay-out rule, based on a 4 to 6 decks, dealer stands on soft 17 basic strategy chart?
Hope you can figure this one out for me.
Keep up the good work!
I show that rule is worth 0.
Despite the incentive to hit 7,7 against a dealer 2-7, the player should still follow basic strategy and split.
I think he should wait because he could get a two, three, four, five, etc.
What do you think?
Or is my friend just a whiner?
Thank you for your time.
Maybe you can take advantage of his complaining by offering to buy his hand for less than the fair slimslot system cents on the dollar.
Bally Gaming has a single-deck, multi-hand, blackjack game.
The player plays seven hands against a blackjack night at home with friends dealer hand.
There is an interesting rule in that if the game runs out of cards, all unbusted player hands automatically win.
What is the probability of running out of cards?
Can have suggest any strategy changes to run out the deck?
The house edge using total-dependent basic strategy is 2.
I ran a 7-player simulation, using total-dependent basic strategy, and the average number of cards used per round was 21.
In almost 190 million rounds played, the most cards ever used was 42, which happened 7 times.
It is my educated opinion that even with computer perfect composition-dependent strategy the player would still realistically never see the last card.
You could cut down the house edge much more using composition-dependent strategy, according to all the cards seen as you go along.
I wrote a letter of complaint about it to the casino manager, stating in part: I just wanted to express my disappointment in this change, if it is true.
I never had a chance to take advantage of the promotion and doubt I will be able to now.
Also, you have thirty days in which to complete the card.
I hope you understand this is not a task that is unreachable with that much time.
I THANK YOU for your letter.
Hope you can give it a try and win some money!
What is the probability of getting 30 blackjacks in four hours?
According to myblackjack players play about 70 hands per hour.
I assume a blackjack tie still gets a stamp.
The probability of filling the card in 4 hours, assuming 280 hands, is 1 in 30,000 playing one hand at a time.
I suspect any player achieving the goal in four hours was playing at least two hands at a time.
This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site.
On a recent Vegas trip I saw the dealer get a 9-card 21.
The rules were six decks and the dealer stood on soft 17.
What are the odds of that?
The probability of the dealer getting exactly a 9-card 21 under those rules is 1 in 32,178,035.
Here is the probability for various numbers of decks and whether dealer hits or https://indonesiaairsoft.com/blackjack/blackjack-newspaper.html on soft 17.
Decks Stand Soft 17 Hit Soft 17 1 1 in 278,315,855 1 in 214,136,889 2 1 in 67,291,581 1 in 41,838,903 4 1 in 38,218,703 1 in 22,756,701 6 1 in 32,178,035 1 in 18,980,158 8 1 in 29,749,421 1 in 17,394,420 Assuming six decks and the dealer stands on soft 17, here is the probability of the dealer getting a 21 or a blackjack in the case of two cardsaccording to the total number of cards.
Cards Probability 2 1 in 21 3 1 in 19 4 1 in 56 5 1 in 323 6 1 in 3,034 7 1 in 42,947 8 1 in 929,766 9 1 in 32,178,035 10 1 in 1,986,902,340 11 1 in 270,757,634,011 12 1 in 167,538,705,629,468 Not that you asked, but the next table shows the probability of the dealer making any non-busted hand under the same rules by the number of cards.
Cards Probability 2 1 in 3 3 1 in 4 4 1 in 12 5 1 in 67 6 1 in 622 7 1 in 8,835 8 1 in 193,508 9 1 in 6,782,912 10 1 in 424,460,108 11 1 in 58,597,858,717 12 1 in 36,553,902,750,535 For more discussion about this question, please visit my forum at.
Sign Up For Updates You're Subscribed!
Enter your email address below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter along with other special announcements from The Wizard of Odds!

Playing Blackjack with $2,000 worth of chips to celebrate 2,000 + subscribers

402 403 404 405 406

Amazon.com : Trademark Blackjack Accessories Set (Multi) : Blackjack Supplies : Sports & Outdoors.. Simple set to use for nights at home with friends.


31.12.2019 in 10:58 Akizilkree:

It seems magnificent phrase to me is

25.12.2019 in 06:07 Kigarg:

In my opinion you are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.

30.12.2019 in 09:55 Zolok:

I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Write to me in PM.

25.12.2019 in 08:44 Yozshujar:

Yes, really. And I have faced it. Let's discuss this question.

22.12.2019 in 13:01 Tulkis:

I think, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.

23.12.2019 in 02:59 Tojajora:

Strange any dialogue turns out..

23.12.2019 in 08:45 Melkree:

It is unexpectedness!

22.12.2019 in 12:53 Babei:

Yes, all can be

22.12.2019 in 04:18 Kigami:

I consider, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss it.

31.12.2019 in 08:34 Kigabar:

You are not right. Let's discuss.

30.12.2019 in 00:21 JoJotilar:

The matchless theme, is pleasant to me :)

30.12.2019 in 00:18 Gujar:

You commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.

24.12.2019 in 09:45 Maulmaran:

I can suggest to visit to you a site, with a large quantity of articles on a theme interesting you.

29.12.2019 in 11:20 Akinonos:

Absolutely with you it agree. It is good idea. It is ready to support you.

22.12.2019 in 04:09 Shaktijin:

You are absolutely right. In it something is also to me it seems it is good thought. I agree with you.

23.12.2019 in 21:52 Arajinn:

Charming phrase

28.12.2019 in 16:52 Gardakora:

I congratulate, a brilliant idea

27.12.2019 in 20:05 Arashidal:

It � is improbable!

28.12.2019 in 04:44 Samule:

In it something is. Clearly, thanks for the help in this question.

24.12.2019 in 14:08 Kagagis:

Excuse for that I interfere � I understand this question. Let's discuss.

22.12.2019 in 12:12 Dounos:

As the expert, I can assist. I was specially registered to participate in discussion.

23.12.2019 in 21:31 Samurg:

The authoritative point of view

24.12.2019 in 17:39 Dour:

The excellent message gallantly)))

Total 23 comments.