Unstoppable Blackjack System!
What is the value of the blackjack system called "Mastering the Flow?
It claims not to be a counting system, yet the vague description of the system that the website gives makes it sound like counting to me.
The claims are pretty out-there: "Win every time" etc.
I count cards using the KO PREFERREDand understand that this new "system" has to be either a simplistic count strategy, or a scam.
Would you look into it for us, the gullible public?
I had a look at the web site oscar system blackjack also found what little he says about the theory behind his system makes it sound like card counting.
However I'm deeply skeptical of anything that claims to "blow old fashioned card counting away.
Any tips on money management in blackjack?
I usually double after a win, go back to my original bet after three wins or any lossand play the game according to the book.
I usually do pretty well, but it's slow and steady and not very exciting.
I don't put a lot of emphasis on betting systems.
In the long run you will lose the same percentage of money bet no matter what system you use.
So my advice is use a system that maximizes the fun of the game.
Indo you improve your chances see more playing oscar system blackjack hands at once for x each, versus 1 hand at a time for 2x?
If the odds are better, how much better?
The simple answer is no, it neither helps you nor hurts you.
However, you will have less bankroll variance by betting two hands of x as opposed to one of 2x.
Card counters are an exception to the simple no, they may play multiple hands to draw more cards out of a deck rich in good cards, thus improving their odds.
I've even taken your blackjack data and made it into a full-color pocket-sized page that I carry in oscar system blackjack briefcase for those unexpected trips to Vegas.
I've memorized and follow your rules and generally do well but of course there are times when I lose.
Two questions, you said in a previous answer that you don't cap your winnings.
How do you determine when to stop?
When have you "won enough" so you avoid regression toward the mean and lose it back?
Second question, does the number of hits one takes effect the outcome?
For example, if I have five cards that total 15 against a dealer's 10, am I pressing my luck by taking a sixth card?
In other words, are the odds of busting on a 5-card 15 the same as casino blackjack rules on a 2-card 15?
Thank for the compliment click I'm happy to help your bankroll last longer.
When I gamble for fun I keep playing until it isn't fun any longer.
Usually the fun ends when I have lost too much or have played too long.
With the ups and downs of blackjack it takes hundreds of hours before regression toward the mean will cause actual results to look like expected results.
Furthermore, the player who puts a conservative cap on their winnings is never going to experience the fun of a long hot winning streak.
Keep in mind this is just what works for me.
You should do what oscar system blackjack are comfortable with.
Everything I have to say about money management can be summarized by the following two rules 1 don't gamble with money you can't afford to lose, and 2 don't gamble if it isn't fun.
Regarding your second question, there is something to oscar system blackjack said about the composition of a hand.
The fewer the decks the more this is true.
My blackjack and show the exceptions to single- and double-deck blackjack, based on the composition of the hand.
These appendices show that the more cards that are in your hand the more inclined you should be to stand.
Regarding your 15 against a 10 example, there are two situations in single deck blackjack where you should stand when the 15 is composed of 5 cards, A+A+A+6+6 and A+A+3+5+5.
Note that in both of these situations either two fives or two sixes have left the deck which are the two most helpful cards for the player.
The two situations where you should be the most inclined to stand if you have a multiple card hand are 16 against a 10 and a 12 against a 3.
I find that to be unbelievable, besides I found that computer simulations are definitely not the same as live world action.
Also why don't casinos introduce video blackjack to thwart the card counters and get rid of dealers?
I biggest blackjack hand said numerous times that there is no long-term way to beat a game with a house edge.
The results always approach the house edge in the long-term.
It is not just oscar system blackjack simulations that back this up but the fundamental laws of probability.
About video blackjack, that may be the way suggest blackjack clipart you the future.
I have seen fully electronic tables with video display at the World Gaming Expo.
I have also seen tables that with cameras can track every bet and every play each player makes.
This enables the house to accurately comp players and alert them to card counters.
These tables look and feel like any other blackjack table, so you card counters may be out of business if these tables are successful.
Have you ever heard of the Ken Fuchs progression.
If so, would you please e-mail me or post the details on your site.
Obviously in normal bj play you experience streaks of wins and loses.
Where is the faulty logic in "minimize your losing streaks by resetting at 1 unit, and increase your winning streaks by raising 1 unit after each win?
Thanks for you time.
Thanks for all of the great info.
Progressive oscar system blackjack systems, like yours, will turn a good session into a great one without the risk of catastrophic loss as with regressive systems read more the Martingale.
However progressive systems will turn a choppy neutral session into a bad one.
Consider what would happen if you alternated click here a win and a loss the entire session.
I play the negative system in black jack meaning I double every time I lose until I Win.
I wanted to what the odds are of losing 4,5,6,7,8,9 hands in a row?
How many hands should I expect to play till I lost 8 hands which is my stopping point?
The name for this system is the Martingale.
Ignoring ties the probability of a new loss for a hand of blackjack is 52.
So the probability of losing 8 in a row is.
This just goes to show that you should always have double or split money available if you need it.
Occasionally I will increase the bet because I "feel" like I am going to win the next one.
I would think that just about all recreational players bet on feel once in a while at least.
I was reading through some of your past Ask the Wizard columns and saw your calculation of the probability of a string of losses in the August 4, 2002 Column.
My question though is what does that really mean?
Is it that when I sit down at the table, 1 out of my next 173 playing sessions I can expect to have an 8 hand losing streak?
Or does it mean that on any given loss it is a 1 in 173 chance that it was the first of 8 losses coming my way?
I know, I know, its some sort of divine intervention betting system I am talking about and no betting system affects the house edge.
Besides every once in awhile throwing down a bigger bet just adds to the excitement and for some reason it seems logical that if you have lost a string of hands you are "due" for a win.
I have no problem with increasing your bet when you get a lucky feeling.
What is important is that you play your cards right.
Unless you are counting cards you have the free will to bet as much as you want.
As I always say all betting systems are equally worthless so flying by the seat of your pants is just as good as flat betting over the long term.
When I said the probability of losing 8 hands in a row is 1 in 173 I meant that starting with the next hand the probability of losing 8 in a row is 1 in 173.
The chances of 8 losses in a row over a session are greater the longer the session.
I hope this answers your question.
First let me say I love your site and will be visiting each of the advertisers to help support it.
I hope you are doing very well financially as you are undoubtedly saving a lot of people a lot of money.
My question is do you have any advice for Blackjack players participating in Blackjack tournaments?
I have participated in a few and have came very close to advancing to the "money" round with no real strategy other than stay close to the leaders on the table and bet it all on the last hand.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks for the kind words.
I appreciate the thought of visiting the advertisers.
So unless you might actually play there is no pressure any longer to click through the banners.
Blackjack tournaments are not my strong subject.
For advice on that I would highly recommend.
Wong says that if you are behind to bet opposite of the leader, small when he bets big, and big when he bets small.
If you are in the lead then you should bet with the second highest player.
The book gets into much more detail.
Speaking of supporting my site, it helps to click through my Amazon links when buying books there.
How do you calculate the expected return for a blackjack game with a.
Does it matter if you flat bet assuming that the bets are relatively small compared to the BR or bet based on the Kelly criterion, or does the Kelly criterion just see more the risk of ruin?
Your expected loss of this play is 0.
The betting system will not affect the expected loss, but will affect the volatility.
Does losing a hand at blackjack increase the probability that the composition of the deck is in your favor?
More specifically, is your expected return click at this page one hand ever positive after a given net loss since the last shuffle?
Without knowing anything else, if you lost the last hand in blackjack then it is slightly more likely that more small cards than large just left the deck.
This would make the remaining deck more large card rich and thus lower the house edge.
However I speculate this is an extremely small effect.
Yet it does go to show that if you must use a betting system one that increases the bet after a loss is better than one that increases after a win.
I hesitate to put this in writing at all because again the effect is probably very small and I fear system sellers will misquote me and imply I endorse any system, which I DO NOT.
I have a question about a blackjack tournament, where only the largest stack at the end is paid.
If no one knows anything about the other chipstacks, what chipstack should you be looking for before being satisfied?
However, having played a lot of blackjack, streaks good and bad do happen.
So, I am wondering, without card counting, would tracking simple wins vs.
In other words, would you be able to obtain a small percentage advantage for the remaining third of the shoe if you knew the win-loss ratio was out unban chatroulette software whack?
In 2004 somebody accepted my betting system challenge, claiming he could beat blackjack without counting.
The details are in my page on the.
After I posted it, I received a message from a blackjack genius, who goes by the handle "Cacarulo.
Knowing how knowledgeable he is about blackjack, I felt that he was probably right, so I declined the challenge.
I tend to think that he would have bet the minimum most of the time, except if it was late in the shoe, and the ratio of losses to wins was very high since the last shuffle, he would have bet the maximum.
The reason is that losing is positively correlated to small cards being played, and winning to large cards.
In other words, a benefit of losing click here that it tends to make the count better.
However, this is a weak correlation.
My challenge allowed the player a bet range of 1 to 1,000, which is probably enough to overcome the house edge, but it will be hard to find a real casino click to see more with a jump in bet size by a factor of 1,000.
The short answer to your question is, no, tracking wins and losses will not help enough to warrant the bother of doing it.
Sign Up Oscar system blackjack Updates You're Subscribed!
Enter your email address below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter along with other special announcements from The Wizard of Odds!
[New FX Triple Threat] With Oscar's Grind + Wins Every Practice + But Confidence Is Still Shaken...
Oscar's System. Blackjackalso known as twenty-oneis a comparing card game betting usually several players and a dealer, where each player in turn blackjack ...
I regret, that I can not participate in discussion now. I do not own the necessary information. But with pleasure I will watch this theme.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - I am late for a meeting. I will return - I will necessarily express the opinion.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also to me this idea is pleasant, I completely with you agree.
I consider, that you commit an error. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
In my opinion you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
There are some more lacks
I do not understand
I am sorry, this variant does not approach me. Perhaps there are still variants?
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
Just that is necessary.
You did not try to look in google.com?
In it something is. I thank for the information, now I will know.
It agree, a remarkable phrase
I congratulate, your idea is useful
I am sorry, it at all does not approach me.
I am final, I am sorry, but it at all does not approach me. Who else, what can prompt?
At all I do not know, as to tell
I would like to talk to you, to me is what to tell on this question.
Excuse for that I interfere � To me this situation is familiar. It is possible to discuss. Write here or in PM.
This amusing message
It is remarkable, very valuable message
I consider, that you are not right. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
I congratulate, what words..., a brilliant idea
I hope, you will find the correct decision.
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.