$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

­čĺ░ Podcast - Mike Shackleford, Wizard of Odds - Gambling With An Edge

Tell blackjack wizardofodds seems magnificent
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • 97% payout rates and higher
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Players welcome!
  • Licensed and certified online casino

Wizardofodds blackjack

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth
  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood

Play slots for real money

  1. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  2. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
  3. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Unlimited free play
  • Slot tournaments
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Monthly drawings
Join the Club!

Survey of blackjack rules in Las Vegas and surrounding areas.. Spanish https://wizardofodds.com/games/spanish-21/; s17 Dealer stands on´┐Ż... Click to Play!

This strategy produced by www.wizardofodds.com encompasses the following key rules; * There is. 5 Card Charlie (5 cards under 22 points) beats a Blackjack Click to Play!

Here you can check and use a calculator that gives you the house edge for virtually any set of blackjack rules and it can be used with proper´┐Ż... Click to Play!

Michael Shackleford, who is also known as the "Wizard of Odds" and the author of "Gambling 102," gives a. Click to Play!


Confused after looking at the WizardofOdds Blackjack Survey - Las Vegas Forum - TripAdvisor


Michael Shackleford also known as the Wizard of Odds is one of the most well. If you have ever seen a blackjack strategy card at a table, a casino gift shop or´┐Ż...
Last week the Wizard of Odds conducted an interview with blackjack legend Stanford Wong, who wrote the legendary blackjack strategy book´┐Ż...
However, I found a strategy chart on how to play the tie bet for six deck blackjack game in the Wizard of Odds website but I am having trouble´┐Ż...


Mississippi Stud: How to Play and win with Gambling Expert Michael "Wizard of Odds" Shackleford


The Death of Blackjack and What Games Are Replacing It | The Motley Fool Wizardofodds blackjack


The Wizard of Odds. 4560_1143156373671_5608316_n.jpg BLACKJACK PHOTO Darryl Purpose in Las Vegas, circa early 1980s, disguised in brown-tinted´┐Ż...
Braun, Julian H., ´┐ŻComparing the Top Blackjack Systems,´┐Ż Gambling Quarterly,. Attack Blackjack,´┐Ż 2010, www.wizardofodds.com/doubleattack-blackjack.php.
Ken Tucker conducts an interview with Michael Shackleford, the Wizard of Odds to get his thoughts on blackjack.



Blackjack Online Wizard Of Odds


wizardofodds blackjack
Buy Blackjack Strategy Card by The Wizard of Odds, Michael Shackleford, for Double Deck, Dealer Hits on Soft 17: Card Games - Amazon.com ? FREE.
There are several blackjack variants, games that look like a regular blackjack. basic strategy for Spanish 21; The Spanish 21 page on the wizardofodds site´┐Ż...

wizardofodds blackjack You will have to free before you can post: click the r e g i s t e r link to proceed.
To start viewing wizardofodds blackjack, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Either the wizard's math is wrong, or I'm making a mistake somewhere in calculating this: Basic strategy for a game with the 6 card charlie rule in effect.
Here is the wizard's strategy: So lets look at an example He says to hit a five card 17 v 2, but there are no numbers to explain his calculations S17 8 deck, The EV of STANDING on, for example, 17 2,3,4,5,3 v 2 is -0.
Im finding that almost all the examples of hitting 17 are wrong, and hitting 16 v 2-6 is always wrong What am i missing?
I'm hoping im miscalculating this somehow, but dont think that i am.
In eight decks, the standing e.
If you hit, you have exactly 0.
So, unless I'm missing something also, standing is clearly better.
FWIW, in his Basic Blackjack, Wong also gives standing, so something seems to be wrong with Mike's chart.
I will write to him.
Don In eight decks, the standing e.
If you hit, you have exactly 0.
So, unless I'm missing something also, standing is clearly better.
FWIW, in his Basic Blackjack, Wong also gives standing, so something seems to be wrong with Mike's chart.
I will write to him.
DonI was using single deck for the hit, i may have mixed that with 8 deck to get the -0.
Here is our correspondence: Mike, One of the members here Norm's forum questioned the accuracy of your chart for 5- and 6-card Charlies, which can be found here: Specifically, he said that it made no sense to him that, for a six-card Charlie, which would be an automatic winner of one bet, you would hit 17 vs.
I verified in Wong's charts that, in fact, this was not a hit, but the math is rather source to see.
I posted the following to the forum: In eight decks, the standing e.
If you hit, you have exactly 0.
So, unless I'm missing something also, standing is clearly better.
FWIW, in his Basic Blackjack, Wong also gives standing, so something seems to be wrong with Mike's chart.
I will write to him.
Don Hi Don, You make a good argument there.
I will remove for now given it obviously is flawed.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Mike Mike, I have wizardofodds blackjack more thought.
For the hand in question, there is obviously a big difference between a 5-card and 6-card Charlie, as the former pays double.
But you have only one footnote, as if hitting 17 vs.
In fact, if you do the math, and Wong seems to agree Table 22, Basic Blackjackit's right to hit for the 5-card, but not the 6-card, Charlie.
You had separate charts for splitting but not for hitting and standing, so maybe you needed to distinguish between the two for that also.
Don I wrote to Mike.
Here is our correspondence: Mike, One of the members of Norm's forum questioned the accuracy of your chart for 5- and 6-card Charlies, which can be found here: Specifically, he said that it made no sense to him that, for a six-card Charlie, which would be an automatic winner of one bet, you would hit 17 vs.
I verified in Wong's charts that, in fact, this was not a hit, but the math is rather simple to see.
I posted the following to the forum: In eight decks, the standing e.
If you hit, you have exactly american blackjack scaler />So, unless I'm missing something also, standing is clearly better.
FWIW, in his Basic Blackjack, Wong also gives standing, so something seems to be wrong with Mike's chart.
I will write to him.
Don Hi Don, You make a good argument there.
I will remove for now given it obviously is https://indonesiaairsoft.com/blackjack/blackjack-pch.html />Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Mike Mike, I have one more thought.
For the hand in question, there is obviously a big difference between a 5-card and 6-card Charlie, as the former pays double.
But you have only one footnote, as if hitting 17 vs.
In fact, if you do the math, and Wong seems to agree Table 22, Basic Blackjackit's right to hit for the 5-card, but not the 6-card, Charlie.
You had separate charts for splitting but not for hitting and standing, so maybe you needed to distinguish between the two for that also.
The game i play has 6 card charlie and is single deck this is very important strategy i need to know, but i think that i have it all figured out perfectly.
The game i play has 6 card charlie and is single deck this is very important strategy i need to know, but i think that i have it all figured out perfectly.
Just go to the site where you orignally found the flawed one.
The game i play has 6 card charlie and is single deck this is very important strategy i need to know, but i think that i have it all figured out perfectly.
For 6 card auto winner you need to select the far right radio button in the wizardofodds blackjack winner section of rules options.
You can fill in whatever number of decks you would like along with any of the other available rules options.
For a player hand of 2-3-4-5-3 you simply click 2-3-4-5-3 under player cards.
When you are finished, click compute and the EVs for what you have entered will be displayed for the shoe composition that is displayed.
Shoe composition can also be input.
Reset removes all player cards.
Undeal removes the last player card.
If you click compute with no player cards entered or also 1 card, which displays EVs given player knows one of his cards prior to the hand being dealt an overall calculation for the shoe composition entered is done.
When 2 or more cards are entered the EVs for the player cards that were entered is displayed.
Although I have several ideas of additions to the website, I very rarely add anything because of time constraints.
That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved.
The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage.
To maximize our click to see more, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side.
Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.
Copyright ´┐Ż 2018All rights reserved.
Blackjack Wizardofodds blackjack is a message board.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this forum are those of the authors and do not blackjack mulligan net reflect the position of the management.


Wizard of Odds Interview -- Part 1


278 279 280 281 282

Blackjack - Wizard of Odds Wizard Of Odds, Online Casino Bonus, Jack Black,. presents the odds, rules and complete strategy charts for casino Blackjack.


COMMENTS:


21.12.2019 in 21:38 Mezira:

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.



24.12.2019 in 08:41 Mazugis:

I regret, that I can not participate in discussion now. I do not own the necessary information. But this theme me very much interests.



22.12.2019 in 08:38 Brasar:

I congratulate, it seems magnificent idea to me is



21.12.2019 in 07:31 Kisar:

I am sorry, that has interfered... At me a similar situation. Is ready to help.



24.12.2019 in 06:23 Tohn:

On mine the theme is rather interesting. I suggest all to take part in discussion more actively.



27.12.2019 in 06:55 Nalkis:

I join. All above told the truth. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.



23.12.2019 in 20:20 Vobei:

It is remarkable, very valuable message



29.12.2019 in 11:08 Zolozahn:

The nice answer



25.12.2019 in 05:24 Vudoran:

I think, that you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.



25.12.2019 in 00:48 Dazragore:

Bravo, magnificent idea



22.12.2019 in 05:04 Zulkitaur:

I consider, that you are not right. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.



28.12.2019 in 14:00 Mezirn:

I think, that you are mistaken. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.



28.12.2019 in 02:42 Mazugis:

What nice idea



28.12.2019 in 19:36 Fauran:

In my opinion you are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.



27.12.2019 in 07:41 Ket:

I consider, that you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



28.12.2019 in 03:13 Gajas:

What can he mean?



24.12.2019 in 19:23 Galkis:

Whence to me the nobility?



25.12.2019 in 16:01 Meztigul:

Without conversations!



24.12.2019 in 20:09 Kekazahn:

Your phrase is very good



26.12.2019 in 18:27 Kigarg:

I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM.



28.12.2019 in 01:12 Miktilar:

The matchless message, is pleasant to me :)



27.12.2019 in 18:50 Dilrajas:

The properties leaves, what that



21.12.2019 in 03:33 Doubei:

There can be you and are right.



25.12.2019 in 00:20 Meztikasa:

I consider, that you are mistaken. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.



26.12.2019 in 17:03 Kejora:

You are not right. I suggest it to discuss.



25.12.2019 in 21:30 Shaktisar:

At you a uneasy choice



23.12.2019 in 00:45 Moogur:

As the expert, I can assist.




Total 27 comments.